Post by Ironshirtz

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch

but it is encrypted
and you do not have the decrypt key
so all you have is a time stamp to something you cannot decrypt
so it proves nothing

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch

that's like proper Creg Vision

What the chain says
Block
963 635
Time
2026-08-24T00:57:28Z
Signer
1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF Unverified

Replies (9)

1Pif9p…3xcE Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1aUt6N…jRpF

you could encrypt one half. put the hash of the decrypted content next to the encrypted content. and keep a local copy of the content itself. that way you publish encrypted but have a timestamp to show provenance.

1aUt6N…jRpF Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pif9p…3xcE

you might as well only put the hash on chain
as that is all that matters then

1Pif9p…3xcE Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1aUt6N…jRpF

no. twetch would show my file to paying audience. while i have proof

1Pif9p…3xcE Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Pif9p…3xcE

taps sign

chris co 1mo

yes. which is fine with me. twitter with micropayments. but i think the original idea of "tweets etched on chain" would be lost, as whatever is etched on chain with the twetch encryption key would only be consumable through the twetch server. we would then need a twetchetch for twetches etched on chain.

Continue thread →