i was more so making the joke of you approaching him first from Facebook -> Twitter -> Twetch, 'following' him from platform to platform.
you should look objectively at how you approach people
Post by twetch#20137
It's totally insane to suggest that I followed anyone onto Twetch. I actually got a link River posted and thought it might be fun. Then I saw @292 telling damaging lies about me. He's not joking. He's trying to cause harm and that's completely illegal.
What the chain says
- Block
- 624 798
- Time
- 2020-03-04T22:36:41Z
- Signer
- 16BXp8aSKoQk3vq27RfCe4gPAnKwGCGPcV
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#20137
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
16BXp8aSKoQk3vq27RfCe4gPAnKwGCGPcV VerifiedReplies (11)
the way you handle situations is the problem, not that you're on the same platform. also luckily for you all his 'damaging lies' are there for everyone to see forever and it's on you to prove it.
You're referring to two different issues. One is my personality which I admit is flawed.
The other is people telling damaging lies about me which is not okay even if I'm a jerk. See CSW.
Proving something didn't happen is usually impossible just fyi.
The exception would be if you have 100% surveillance for a fixed window of time. But as long as @292 stops saying I stalked him, I don't care if he calls me a poo-poo head or whatever.
Ironically, he kinda stalked my Tweets when I was Bitcoin App Dev.
the burden of proof is on you at this point, because from an outside prospective you approached him on multiple platforms admittedly. an easy proof is to post the tweet saying "we're cool" proving he at one point approved interacting with you.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.