the way you handle situations is the problem, not that you're on the same platform. also luckily for you all his 'damaging lies' are there for everyone to see forever and it's on you to prove it.
Post by twetch#20137
You're referring to two different issues. One is my personality which I admit is flawed.
The other is people telling damaging lies about me which is not okay even if I'm a jerk. See CSW.
Proving something didn't happen is usually impossible just fyi.
What the chain says
- Block
- 624 798
- Time
- 2020-03-04T22:36:41Z
- Signer
- 16BXp8aSKoQk3vq27RfCe4gPAnKwGCGPcV
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#20137
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
16BXp8aSKoQk3vq27RfCe4gPAnKwGCGPcV VerifiedReplies (12)
The exception would be if you have 100% surveillance for a fixed window of time. But as long as @292 stops saying I stalked him, I don't care if he calls me a poo-poo head or whatever.
Ironically, he kinda stalked my Tweets when I was Bitcoin App Dev.
the burden of proof is on you at this point, because from an outside prospective you approached him on multiple platforms admittedly. an easy proof is to post the tweet saying "we're cool" proving he at one point approved interacting with you.
Also ironically, the second definition of stalk is to "stride somewhere in a proud, stiff, or angry manner" which you did on your first post
but that's neither here nor there lol
You are correct about that definition of stalking being irrelevant. Glad you learned some vocab, though :)
From an outside perspective, I've only interacted with Kurt based on his Twetch accusing me of stalking, and I sure as fuck don't need his approval.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.