Post by Y

Unverified · twetch

Because it can. Because it's similar but unlike everything else. None of this means you don't have an investigation.

"Imagine if gold turned to lead when stolen. If the thief gives it back, it turns to gold again," on SN August 11, 2010

Y 1mo
1Gwece…AV6R Unverified · twetch

That's an entirely different thing than confiscation, which comes with obvious risks.

What the chain says
Block
Unconfirmed (mempool)
Time
2026-09-02T18:16:26Z
Signer
1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R Unverified

Replies (3)

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Gwece…AV6R

Abusive confiscation is not really a reality. If it were, we'd have much bigger problems.

Y 1mo
1Gwece…AV6R Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1G15jb…2UXp

It was an unnecessary change that will lead to abuse by gov eventually.

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Gwece…AV6R

You already have abuse of government. You can't avoid abuse of government, DAR or no DAR. That is unless you think there will be a coordinated effort to change government, which I wouldn't hold my breath for.

Again, these are silly fears. Abuse of government, abuse of skilled hackers.