Ryuushi Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

BREAKING🚨: CSW CRUSHING VICTORY October 10, 2023! CONCLUSION ~ KLEIMAN V WRIGHT US 🇺🇸 FEDERAL COURT: "The Order found that “W&K has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that the information provided by Dr. Wright is currently inaccurate,” noting that Judge Reinhart “agree[d] with Dr. Wright that the Form does not require him to disclose #bitcoin held on the blockchain.”

CONCLUSION For these reasons, the Court should overrule Plaintiff’s objections to Magistrate Judge Reinhart’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part W&K’s Motion for Sanctions. Dated: October 10, 2023.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 10th day of October, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF, or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive Notices of Electronic Filing.

"I agree with Dr. Wright that W&K has not met its burden of proving that the July 24 Form fails to comply with the Compulsion Order. In particular, W&K has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that the information provided by Dr. Wright is currently inaccurate. Nor has W&K shown that required information was omitted from the Form. . . . Because W&K has not shown non-compliance with the Compulsion Order, there is no basis for coercive civil contempt sanctions."

https://courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/1056/kleiman-v-wright/

#bitcoin #satoshi

BREAKING🚨: Craig Wright makes bombshell revelations about his relationship with @Microsoft in the early stages of #Bitcoin! Yes, Microsoft.🧶

“I started talking to Microsoft about the solutions. I talked to some other American companies where I was flying out and visited Microsoft (…). I didn’t really explain it terribly well, the White Paper wasn’t ready when I was first talking to them. (…) I’d been talking to Microsoft for six months (…),” Dr. Wright said in the podcast.

Interesting, isn’t it? Again, pitching a project to Microsoft for several months could have left evidence. As far as I can tell from the COPA members list, Microsoft is not part of it.

Furthermore, in the In Early podcast, Dr. Wright explained that before 2008, he used different names for the kind of project that later became known as Bitcoin, such as TimeCoin, for example, or TimeChain. These early drafts of Bitcoin were presented to accounting firm BDO (as witnessed by Neville Sinclair in the Norwegian court case), as well as to Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT).

#Bitcoin #BSV #Satoshi

BREAKING🚨: Decision maintained! A London High Court Judge 🇬🇧 Richard Smith on Monday upheld a previous ruling that http://Bitcoin.org website operators, including the pseudonymous Cøbra Can't Fight $700K Craig Wright Satoshi Nakamoto Legal Fees!

On Monday, London High Court Justice Richard Smith dismissed Cøbra's appeal on the November ruling saying that, although there are several reasons why parties would legally request anonymity, including threat to life, Cøbra's reasons for not identifying themselves seemed "not only unworkable but also risked undermining the very principles of natural justice" because they sought to remain anonymous "not only against the public at large, but against the Claimant [Wright] and the court as well."

Dr Craig Wright aka Satoshi Nakamoto, accused operators of the http://Bitcoin.org payment network's website of infringing his rights by publishing the white paper. Wright claimed that, as Satoshi, he owned the copyright to the #Bitcoin white paper.

Judge David Hodge, QC issued an injunction prohibiting Cobra from infringing Wright's copyright in the U.K., either through making the white paper accessible for download on the website or "in any other way.

An order requiring http://bitcoin.org to publish a copy of the court's order was also issued.

Wright's lawyers said Monday they are awaiting an order on next steps, including whether Cøbra will now be required to pay in full.

#Bitcoin 🚨

Did BSV not work out? @0 is functioning well and has a perfect long-term business model, needing good promotion and a breath of fresh air, perhaps a new look and maybe some innovations. I'm willing to help in whatever is needed!

I've been posting a lot here, and it's incredible how it's still prosperous – pennies dropping into the account all the time, which could be worth a lot in the future...

BTC doesn't scale, and on the internet that now processes millions and billions of data per second, any product built on a platform that can't scale has serious problems in my humble opinion.

BTC can't do anything without some patching, just charging fees upon fees... For a product or app creator, I don't know how viable this can be in the long term...

But I truly believe a lot in the success of OW, and I really hope it thrives more every day! But not because of BTC, but because of this brilliant team behind it. You are so bright that you managed to make a useless thing (BTC) become appealing and attractive... but I sincerely don't know about the future of BTC... I think it's a bigger gamble than even in BSV at this moment...

Jan 24, everything can change, and BTC might not even be called Bitcoin anymore... For BSV, it might be a turning point or it could continue as it is now... I don't want to be out of the game...

Especially because BSV works, and when the tide turns, there won't be a shortage of users building on BSV – it's a better deal than BTC in my opinion!

Big hug, Randy, success broo kek!!!

Busy day today, studying a lot about #BSV and honing my pixel art skills, while brainstorming thousands of ways to add value to #BSV and my followers.

I must admit, it was tough today to keep up with and post all the news about #BSV. It's incredible how quickly things are happening in the #BSV space.

I'm very happy and grateful to everyone for the millions of views, thousands of likes, and retweets that this humble account has been receiving day after day.

Much gratitude for all the supportive and kind messages I've been receiving, praising the work I've been doing. It truly isn't an easy task; it requires a lot of dedication and time, often fitting it in between work and family.

But this is what motivates me to keep going – every new follower, every new message, and anyone who tells me they've opened their eyes to #BSV and its technology, ignoring all the FUD and fake news – it brings immense happiness!

I must admit that I haven't been able to respond to all the messages I've received, unfortunately, but I will reply to all of them as quickly as possible.

My belief is that we are at a point of reflection and acceptance for #BSV. Many people are realizing that BSV's business model is the future and the only one that can support this future in the globalized world we live in today, with millions, billions, or trillions of pieces of information circulating the internet every second. As we move closer to Web3, #BSV is the only one prepared for this, and we need to educate these people!

Every day, doubts about whether Craig is Satoshi (he is) seem less relevant when Satoshi's own vision lives faithfully in #BSV, proving itself every second and speaking for itself.

We're also on the verge of significant legal proceedings (COPA ~ Kleiman) that could deeply impact the entire crypto world.

#BSV halving is also approaching...

Giant companies and governments are beginning to build on #BSV.

All of this excites and deeply motivates me to be here and build on #BSV!

Thank you very much to everyone for the immense care and support. Finishing up editing some news and soon uploading the day's news to the blockchain on #Twetch, and tomorrow completing the rest of the news over at @x!

Ryuushi 🐉 #BSVBlockchain #Bitcoin

Craig Wright never signed and can't prove he's Satoshi?

They lied to you!

He did sign it, on multiple occasions, but only privatel.🧶

Gavin Andresen, in particular, witnessed the signing with a highly contesting and purposeful mindset as he knew what was at stake. After witnessing the first signature, he even went on to request an even more stringent condition for signing. After Wright rejected the idea of signing on Andresen’s own laptop computer for privacy and security reasons, a second signature was done using a completely new laptop computer bought at a store on that day, on the spot, delivered in manufacturer-sealed condition to Andresen. Andresen was completely satisfied and publicly testified for Wright being Satoshi.

It should also be noted that Andresen’s case carries an exceptional amount of weight, and his conviction had a strong additional support. Andresen was arguably the most important individual in the Bitcoin development community other than Satoshi himself. He was the lead Bitcoin developer in the earliest years of Bitcoin and also the founder of Bitcoin Foundation. While Satoshi was anonymous, the two men had extensive private interactions and communications. To prove to Andresen, Wright provided him numerous pieces of unique and important historical knowledge of the Satoshi-Andresen interaction during the early days of Bitcoin, the kind of knowledge that Andresen was completely certain that only Satoshi would have. This is more important than a signature. Unique knowledge can be strong evidence.

Andresen not only gave public testimonies that he was convinced that Wright was Satoshi, but also subsequently testified for the same under oath in a legal deposition, which was presented to the court.

While Andresen himself later expressed dismay over Wright’s failure to provide signature proof publicly, he never retracted his testimony. The crypto community completely distorted his expression of dismay to mislead people into believing that Andresen had retracted his testimony. The straight and verifiable fact is that he never did. Only people who superficially follow propaganda believe or are under an impression that he did.

For reasons quite understandable given the extreme adversarial and oppressive anti-Wright environment that formed subsequently, Andresen has chosen to keep a low-key.

Despite all the evidence, those who take a presumptive position that Wright could not be Satoshi have found it not difficult to imagine reasons to doubt or discredit these private signatures. They therefore demand some kind of a public signing.

"I believe Craig Steven Wright is the person who invented #Bitcoin. I was flown to London to meet Dr. Wright a couple of weeks ago, after an initial email conversation convinced me that there was a very good chance he was the same person I’d communicated with in 2010 and early 2011. After spending time with him I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt: Craig Wright is Satoshi." Gavin Andresen “Right hand of Satoshi”

#Bitcoin #BSV #satoshi