You dont own someone at all if you participate from their income
Just like you dont own a company if you participate from their income/revenue/profits
But we circle around here
1P3nuztTbn1WV7WzfW16gAbMS3vEH3qhdV
You dont own someone at all if you participate from their income
Just like you dont own a company if you participate from their income/revenue/profits
But we circle around here
We were talking about regulation for the model I asked for in my initial post
Not sure why you think I dont know of corporate law
You dont seem to be genuine here, if you want to boomer advice me like that, pay me first as compensation
@740 already seems to be working on drafting agreements in the sense I was mentioning in my initial posts rn
Referencing conformity does not answer my question, but I have answered that in plenty posts already
Nope
Show me the slave trader who asks the slave how much the slave charges for his work
But have answered all that already
Repeating over and over again what @24 said initially does not make it right or righter
Are we in a cult already or what
Branching again, because not many seem to get it
Deeply conversation. I think BSV will eliminate the corporate legal system and revert to the individual. At the same time, funding will also take individuals as the main body of legal responsibility, rather than companies. I'm drafting such an agreement.
Hey, he got what he deserved in the end, why still pick on him?
Can afford that, as long as we stay friends
See? Your comment wouldve gone through, my friend
Not laughing here ... it’s sensible to think about and I’ve thought about it before too. It may become a big thing in the future, for good or bad.
Need a general trolltoll for just everyone
I want to set my price as on dimely.io
Help frog
Not as many capitalists in BSV as I thought
killing fking mercury and other shit in my body via chelate therapy (DMPS and stuff)
sue me
Google the definition of slavery first before repeating.
Never seen a slave trader asking the slave before hand how much he (the slave) charges
I need a modified trolltoll where I can set certain keywords, and whoever mentions these keywords in a response to me has to pay more
I want to trolltoll the words "the" and "and" though
Rn most are laughing
Wait and see
Sure, we would need regulation. But before that, we would need a good technical, preferebly Bitcoin driven solution to actually do that in a convenient way.
Had a great convo in another thread concerning investments in persons instead of in companies.
I see you have changed your user name? Thank god
frog knows
Show us the future then, we need it
Back in the ‘90s David Bowie issued bonds on his future performing income.
The individual has to need the capital or want to disperse the risk against their own investment of time. They will ask for a loan first, then after it’s used, think about equity.
I would want both options to be available with a good, preferebly Bitcoin driven technical solution: investing in companies and investing in persons directly and see where it takes me.
Btw, I have family in Anhui.
You wouldn't "hold people" though, it is a deal by free will on both sides.
The investor has even greater risk!
You could say the people hold the investor with my model.
Have not looked into Baemail yet, but I assume you profit from all the interaction in Baemail.
So lets say there is a "main Baemail" BSV wallet, where your profit goes.
Would you take money and in exchange give the investor a certain % of all income from
Escape mechanisms are a question of detail
I wouldnt let someone participate from my income forever.
Set a date. Limit the investors participation. Do it for 1 year first or whatever. Maybe even monthly, weekly?
BSV makes it possible
I recommend following Liu Ye.
yes.BSV can be settled on a daily basis, or even on a 1 tx basis, so individuals can enjoy rights and obligations rather than companies.
https://twetch.app/t/e8ed0a5bd2dc0885f3c4991272a31487a8a11122671da706b8e223db246d467e
And the investor would not have to care whether Baemail is a company or just Deggen as a private person
All risks are on the investor's side, he has to do his job to find out if you are capable and trustworthy
again: classic investing
Can confirm that discussions on Twetch are more in depth than on Twitter.
I dont see it as our job to protect ill informed investors
ill informed investors = bad investors
But thats a whole other discussion about how much regulation should be in investment in general.