1LPJGc…ctKQ

Pedo art

True, rocket science is not hard. I found that no human produced knowledge is actually that hard to understand for another human.
But no, a monetisation proceses must include a price increase. There is no way around it.

Same number of tokens, more number of users... not rocket science.
Pumps equal success. Sorry to break your stable coin bubble.

Never question the mob and the best programers in the world pattern.

It is absurd to think a price won't pump in a monetisation process.
Let's keep the hodl alive and mock the commies.

Holding BSV is harder than working dude

You obviously want to hold a worse bitcoin, obviously.

Clases https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_ka0x1uXQaVMmmFq0dlTMiMBPPumbdf6

The quote min 4:37 https://youtu.be/g7pykiMzGes?t=2977
He is actually referring to being pure with the Law and against the monetary 'freedom' from the The University of Chicago

Learn Spanish and watch his classes on YouTube. They are epic.
He is pure anarchist by the way, in his own words: “You will not find any anarchist as pure as I am”

@4 is an expert at hyping stuff. Best feature release I've even seen.

There we go!

Chill out, it's soonday.

He literally says Bitcoin is not scarce because it can be divided into 100million Sats.

According to Schiff it’s an infinite supply

Lol no. Another year of stablecoin at 250

No. Only trust comrades.

Never trust a frog

That comes with old UTXOs.
The problem is when you buy in post split, you need to take the decision. One or the other.

Yeah don’t trust the plan, buy Ethereum.

Yes the service was more limited but the crawler saw the file somehow in 2008 and kept a hash of it.

So it is now clear to me that either Craig lies or the Wayback Archive does.

It's interesting they don't have a copy from the las modified date.
But it's clear archive.org claims the PGP key served in that URL has not changed unlike what Craig says.

@385

🧐Was the Wayback Machine registering deleted records and showing that notice instead in 2009?

I just requested them to remove my website and asked them also to not show the message "this has been excluded" so no one can infer they had information about my site in the past. Let's see.

but it's impossible to know as Wayback Machine only stores the body of the HTTP messages, without the headers.

I am not sure why you think Craig is techobabling when he talks about Robots.txt being posible with metadata. You can serve content over HTTP including the directive X-Robots-Tag in the header of the HTTP message, effectively metadata.

Well min 8:25 you said "metadata is a technobabble nonsense" but it's actually the option that makes the most sense.
Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc could had been served over HTTP with 'X-Robots-Tag: none, noarchive' on the HTTP header.

Stock them up, you’re going to need them to feed your family before you even realize it. Boredom won’t save you from socialism.

Excusez-moi ?!