OnlyCube 🧊 Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

Can some one explain the thinking behind Ordinals? I can see why @0 team would use dev team to build a product that will bring over small blockers to our platform and enlighten them on the scale issue.

I have supported and will continue to support Twetch for their work in bringing Satoshi’s Vision to fruition.

However, I’m not comfortable with support the BTC ecosystem for obvious reasons. If you think BTC is a junk protocol then ordinals are too. We didn’t shill Eth or Solana NFTs so why BTC. BCH ordinals soon too?

Get ready for the planetary rug.

@1 @2 @3 @4

Keep BTC and their corruption far away from Twecth brothers. Do your thing but remember what we are here for and don’t get lost in this inscription bs in an attempt to show the blind the truth.

The crypto mainstream doesn’t care what the best peer to peer digital network is and they don’t intend to use one.

The only feature they care about is whether the ticker number goes up and down but mostly up.

People will blind themselves to Layer 2 being bs technology because “faketoshi”. They will happily discount the Bitcoin white paper and shill protocol forks that won’t scale if their bags are pumping.

However, corporations and governments will not use BSV for political reasons alone. Despite their best efforts, they also will not use an alternative protocol because none of them work.

It also helps that no mainstream publication will be honest and those that try to be objective don’t understands protocol differences.

It’s either incompetence or negligence and I lean toward to later.

IPv6 and Bitcoin is inevitable.

We need smaller “indie” companies to build products that can compete and win over the the establishment, forcing their hand.

It’s either this or we purge corruption, removing all political bias. Only then can society come to the objective conclusion that BSV is Bitcoin and Bitcoin is the future.