1ErViQ…HrpA

I think this meme sums up the chainlink use case

Is this the new grift? LARP as an anonymous bigshot with prophetic language, and oh btw just remember to buy your newly minted token as well

Josh banned him for being too high IQ. If he denies this, tell him to reveal the screenshots 😬

Anyone else blocked by Calvin Ayre on Twitter?

I got blocked for saying that CNN is probably not the most credible source 😂

By the time Twetch has 50k active users, Creg the amateur scientist will have onboarded fifty countries to Bitcoin. No flame ofc 😎

A platform like Twetch is only possible because of Craig's ideas and inventions. At least give credit where it is due.

While a decent marketer, he is also a very dishonest person, and frankly an ideological zealot which I find most anarchists to be. He has a lot of extremely stupid takes and he betrayed Bitcoin for his own (foolish) political views. Glad he's stuck w. BCH.

Not all laws are useful, moral or even enforceable. But again that is not an argument for the abolition of law altogether or some such nonsense.

Most people break certain laws at certain times, e.g. jaywalking. That doesn't mean they are anarchists.

Yes, agreed. I'm trying to prevent ppl falling for the anarchist trap. On the surface it might sound cool, but it really is contrary to all reason. It doesn't work - it's a clown ideology. Very similar to communism - not surprising there is much overlap.

Now we talking. The government does indeed need legitimacy, or consent of the governed. This is called social contract. If gov becomes tyrannical or illegitimate, we have a right and duty to institute a new and better one. Anarchy nowhere in this equation.

The idea of anarchy is illogical and naive. There is no way for it to make sense in the real world. Government is not only necessary, it is inevitable. So we agree on this. This is the position of minarchism, which is different from anarchism.

You still benefit from the laws, infrastructure, property rights, and the safety and sovereignty enabled by being part of a nationstate. Live off the grid in the jungle with no jurisdiction and no societal benefits, then your argument would be valid.

It might have been, that would be for a court to decide. So far it doesnt seem like it, as no charges have been brought against the creator. Also what does this have to do with anarchy?

You didn't provide an answer to any of the problems I posed, just endless sophistry. Clearly you are not interested in actually debating, and risk exposing your fragile ideology to critical inquiry so I take that as a concession. Made this just for you:

Roger Ver knows that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto and admit it in private. Why won't he tell the public? 🤔

Already posed plenty of questions that you have purposefully failed to answer, to try to elucidate your position. In fact the comment you are replying to had a Q that you also evaded.

Make a case or don't. Your shifty rhetoric is unimpressive and stale.

So what does need to happen for anarchy to work? I've noted that you still refuse to formulate a proper argument Daniel. Deryk neither. Perhaps you aren't that confident in your position and that's fine. Just don't expect anarchism to be taken seriously.

The author correctly acknowledges that for his idea to work, the entire world must necessarily dissolve their nations and become anarchist at the same time otherwise you have a fatal problem. This is not only impossible, it's irrational thinking.

It's so full of holes, leaps in logical and flawed reasoning that I have a hard time believing anyone who considers themselves moderately intelligent can find this BS convincing. It's juvenile and lazy writing.

"I've been asked to present an argument for anarchy (...) in two words – look around."

Wow, convincing 🙄

"An additional limitation on my argument is that I do not address the question of national defense."

Oops!

Tell me; why do you buy this claptrap?

"Statist" is the slur they use for anyone who doesn't agree with their illogical cultist beliefs. A modern society with institutions of law, police, military, seatbelts and traffic lights? Fucking statists! Mommy put me to bed early? STATIST! 🤣

Absolutely bro, reincarnated asymmetrical men will protect my community from the Chinese military. If only Hong Kong knew that, they really should have asked you. Taiwan could use your advice right about now. Thanks for your very magical input!

Victimhood is a powerful lever. You can exploit the protective instincts of men, the maternal instincts of women, and the good nature of empathetic and righteous people.

Now (false) victimhood is used as a currency to obtain political power.

Oh so you admit you do need an effective defense force, to protect your community from hostility. If only we had a name for this...

But I understand now that you like to deal only in imagination, fiction and magic and I am wasting my time talking to you.

Again, I am not the guy you should be worried about - worry about hostile state actors with military powers. Wake up and deal with reality. Your belief system is based in fictional notions about the real world and human nature. Exactly like communism.

I thought we had gotten rid of the anarchist clown car with BCH. They derailed their coin, their ideas turned out to be crap and the prospect of gaining mass adoption through illegal activity flopped.

Now they come to BSV w. their failed ideas 🤦‍♂️

I don't think Afghanistan, a poor and underdeveloped country with warring tribes and constant political instability who got invaded by multiple greater powers and is still struggling for independence is a good example of anarchist utopia.

True! 🤣

Notice also how comments and likes/dislikes are disabled so nobody can challenge the ideas. I cba to write a thesis on twetch, but his arguments are weak and full of holes.

Anyway, if history had all the answers, you should be able to articulate them.