1DssKr…xXd8

Someone thinks he may have wider audience if using obscure TX messages instead of twetch. 😁

It seems they are.

Unsurprisingly it started on bch,

https://tinyurl.com/y29tzm7h

Ok, who is sending annoying dust?
https://whatsonchain.com/tx/8c3ee21e0b775db38b3f1a40e1b3a1c3a3d274dc861dc7650c1dfe65c9f95f92

/pay @5380 $2

/payto @5380 $2 can you share picture before it was enhanced in photoshop? Tnx.

/pay @6429 $10 keep posting food pictures. 👀️🍴👍

It depends whether you take it to make final decision or just as an input to make your own. 😛

Which herb exactly?

Money spent on elections greatly resemble such scenario.

Hey Reina,
if you want to chat send me your contact info to mp@moneybutton.com baemail.

cu

Do you have any other wishes, perhaps listening to some particular music number. 🙂 In the meantime some people affected by your reckless behaviour would like to know about your whereabouts. 🙂

After all his shit stirring I've came to conclusion he is a whining and malicious attention whore. Looking from a brighter side, bsv is now so big it encompass all parts society, including lunatics like @938

/pay @6429 $5
👀️🍰🍴🤩

Jesus Christ, his own daughter.

Thinking with a dick does that.

That is nice; do checkpoints also fit in this principle?

I've noticed recurring bch idea about bsv being statist. This is black&white perspective where you must be automatically statist if not adhering to bch freedom ideas.From what I've have seen, there are majority of cases which don't fit in such narrow view.

At the end there are people who don't care about philosophical ideas or current system works just fine for them. To sum it up bsv can accommodate anyone who is not insisting to enforce anarchist ideas, and some are slowly waking up to this reality.

Ie. I find it difficult to paint people statist who are annoyed by anarchy more than a state, or entrepreneurs who are profit seeking and don't want to be fucked over in environment where rules to protect their rights are hard to enforce.