steffenkd Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

I am not good with code, but I think Ty Everett from project babbage has mentioned something about "action oriented programming".
I do not think that twetch is designed that way, therefore it will probably face some issues in the future.
But this is just my noob point of view.

Have you looked into certihash and their sentinel-node?
An enterprise doesn't care much about price if the stuff actually solves a problem and is cheaper than their previous solution.

I think there is a difference between fiat price and value.

That all being said, I have lost a lot with buying BSV and I would like to see it go up at some point in time.
Not sure if this will ever happen, but I haven't given up hope yet.

Also a funny coincidence: when on 24.12.2022 the price was really low and the mining profitability dropped really low as well, we had a convenient price pump.
Similar to spring 2020, when BTC was close to 3000$.
BTC in my opinion is, like you already said, manipulated.
And TPTB already control it.

And like you have already mentioned in another post if I remember right, that BSV is being mined or has been mined at a loss as well.
Which bares the question who is doing that.
Maybe TPTB as well or another "entity".
There seldom is an agonist without an antagonist.
Nobody, except for god/universe can control everything.

The main reason for the ETF is probably that the fiat money system can be used in a very direct way to make profits and maybe even manipulate the price.

Could be, that the government is behind all of crypto but I doubt it.
There has been the "how to make a mint" NSA paper.
There are many theories, can't proof nor disproof any of them.

However, I still think, that BitcoinSV is probably the most efficient network I have seen so far, which incentivices honesty as long as an economic majority has a demand for "honesty".
It is a neutral tech and the future will show if humanity adapts it and how they apply it.
It won't be perfect and maybe it is a trap, but I hope not.
In my opinion other networks like monero, firo and similar privacy coins should and probably will be available as well.

I haven't made up my mind about the other "scams" you have mentioned.
Many of them I can't proof nor disproof myself, but the official narrative is kinda weird.
I know about Galen Winsor and think that he has a point.
The voting and vaccine stuff I have lived through and experienced myself and in my opinion both makes no sense.

Funny how the official story has many flaws and stuff which makes no sense.
Look, I do not know what happened, but I am quite sure, that the moon landing footage is fake.
Do I can be 100% sure?
Of course not.
But in my mind it has a very high probability, that it is fake.
Do I build my worldview, ego or existence upon on it?
No, I got better anchors.

I love the "moron argumentation style" - always enriching any interaction.

Wow, so you tell me I can listen to the whole audio?
I could have made an audio when I was seven years old where me and my brother traveled to alpha centauri first, afterwards went to candyland planet and then traveled to the milky way and ate one milky chocolate bar after another. Returning to earth completely safe and sound. And all the other kids believed us. Because their good friend steffen has told them, his brother said it was true and they even had an audio tape.
Happened over 7 times btw, more often then NASA went to the moon.
I am not sure if there is anything easier fakeable than audio, especially when on a tape.
Where is the original video content from the first moon landing which would actually have some weight?
Rhetorical question, you do not have to repeat the official NASA explanation for that convenient accidental loss.

So where you make the distinction and draw the line between your knowledge you got from all the photos you have seen, readings you have read and audios you have listened to on the internet and us morons which also have consumed content on the internet?
Because it is from the official NASA site?
And 9/11 is true, because the government website says so and even has video footage of planes crashing into the towers?
And corona was a killer virus, because the government and official organisations say so and even have statistical graphics which supports their narrative?
And a BTC transaction including 2x8 million bitcoin coinbase transactions to AntPool and FoundryUSAPool is true and valid because over 50% of the hashrate (AntPool+FoundryUSA) says so?

On your - "This is the problem these days, you assume it's fake because you don't understand how it works."
Oh I completely understand how it "could" work and that it "would" make sense "if" it happened that way and is all true.
Which is a completely different topic.
But there are many other discrepancies which can't be explained away that easily.

So your "just do some basic research, it is amazing what you can learn when you you don't just assume things like morons do" could be true.
But it could be equally false.
Because there is no difference in morons research compared to your research.
And your research seems to consist of believing everything NASA releases as true.
Which is fine with me.

On your "We live in a time when you can find the answers to almost anything at your finger tips but people still choose to be ignorant because it pats their ego on the head."
We can make observations, and we can come up with different explanations/answers for those observations.
And in many cases we simply do not know which explanation is true.
Admitting that simple fact would be a blessing for humanity.
Especially when tax payers money is involved.

NASA is just one powerful node where you and millions of others get their narrative from and keep on propagating.
I will stick with the many small nodes which have shown discrepancies in the NASA footage.
Because a transaction is invalid as soon as there is just one wrong number/discrepancy. And the moon landing footage has many discrepancies.

Now I will reply once more but after that I won't discuss this topic any further since it makes no sense in my opinion and would be a waste of time for the both of us.
There is content on the internet for both narratives I stick with the "NASA faked it".
And I won't copy paste something which is available for everybody who wants to test the antithesis to his hypothesis.