MBC Name and picture from twetch — not on-chain. The signature is; the profile is not.

Because you like money?

Good analogy TK.
One of my masters (disclaimer: I only have 2 masters, not 17... and they are not from schools any better than his!) is in military arts. The level of shenanigans here, in the bitcoin sphere, is full-on Clausewitz "fog of war" territory...

Looking forward to this. This has been a core of the promise of the blockchain and I haven't yet seen clear examples. A data export/import tool of sorts. Not sure if some sort of interface control document would be needed or if it's inherent in the chain..

This is why I often ask simple, naive, questions about basic things - to see if I get clear answers, no answers, obfuscation, ridicule... as the response style is often more revealing than the content itself.

Also, agree the world doesn't want bitcoin...

Precisely what I was thinking! Followed by a harami candlestick, cup and handle, a descending triangle, and a partridge in a pear tree.

The Bucks lookin' like BSV's price action...

Time to tokenize yourself.

Still true?

Nevermind - get the jab... no need to add funds for something that doesn't require funds usage... must have been running low on caffeine. Thought I saw them also mention Twetch, but that was an unbounded article.

@2956
"Where did you grow up?"
"In Oregon"
"Oh, oh, now it makes sense."

😂

What is this a critique of? That something like powping or twetch is not a compelling use case to make people jump through hurdles... or that people shouldn't use KYC platforms to buy coin?

Ha - sorry frog. No, looking for education on what the internet culture in large views this Pepe character as. I understand the start-up value of provocateur... just wasn't sure if this frog was part of that or all-together separate. Just boomer questions.

So... @4 - I saw your comment about not being able to load the frog avatar. I'm not "that" old - but my internet slang savviness probably puts me closer to "boomer" status than 90% on this platform. When I looked up Pepe, it seems tied to racism - is that

Gotta love those that exploit the system. At least the highlight things to be aware of...

Filing in McCormack case, not McCormack's filing per se...

I grabbed the last McCormack filing (30 Jul, posted 4 Aug). Gives you the timeline beyond the frequently ref'd 4 Sep date. UK filings are awful, lag quite a bit and then you have to pay 10 pounds to "request" a copy be provided. Libel laws also seem odd...

What's the deal w/ the 49.6% mined by "other" pools on BSV today? Is that normal?

I don't know if I've seen a distribution like that since watching the chain (not very long admittedly). Is that 49.6% attribution to other anomalous??

Got it!
Thanks!

It's all good. There's a lot of indicators, but also a lot of distortion. I agree w/ @3505 though that the perpetual lack of resolution weighs things down. An oddity, whereby his "tail" is so big, but not verifiable, it's detracting potential suitors...

There's so much manipulation on all sides in these filings, couldn't really say. Proving "Satoshiism" isn't at heart of the Kleiman case though (both parties assume he can access to SN's coins). Hoping McCormack case will be a little more revealing...

Yep - that's why I put that little warning. I know folks want to focus on BSV and not CSW (and I agree with that) - but I'm just fascinated in this from a person/moral/legal drama perspective. Doesn't impact my perceptions on BSV's value prop vs BTC, etc.

Sorry, Lynn Wright. Craig's ex-wife. She (via lawyers, of course) went back to Palm Beach county and said Ira should have never been given/assumed rights to act on W&K's behalf. Note: W&K is who is actually suing CSW in the Kleiman case (not Ira as a perso

Warning: CSW-related post - keep moving along if you don't care about him

PSA: Looks like a hearing has been set in the Kleiman probate case (which Lynn has been challenging) for the morning of 15 Sep. It will be via Zoom, not sure if I can post the pas

@1350's Streamanity video was a great social experiment though. I saw $5 for a short video that I imagined would not be very informative and though it was crazy... but swiped anyway. He'll have to re-think given possible caveat emptor magnification now...

@1350 - do you have a link to a summary of your charity idea that @255 and @3 referenced in their video at about the 1:32 mark? Or was it just a casually ref'd use case?

https://streamanity.com/video/9KTzCVs5H7cX

What are you working on @4?

Datacosm?

So, yesterday New Delhi was auctioned on CityOnChain for $808. I watched the bids go back and forth with just a handful of people. It's a very thin market (watched bids bounce back-and-forth between just a few people) - but they believe in it I suppose.