12N7eq…W6sn

to know that the noun 'god' has no referent and leave it at that ("i am an atheist") is to misunderstand the deep grammar of that word.

sure.
still, it seems advisable to move on.

ethics is only sound without a religious foundation. but religion is the expression of a deep, common, and important human impulse, at the root of much of what is great in civilization.

CSW published passport pictures on his own blog - put your ICU leak to rest.

https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/how-the-world-works-or-a-discourse-on-fake-news/

schmaltzy violins.

either there is a second wave, or epidemiologists are as full of it as economists.

it's excrutiatingly slow on safari.

keep crushing it! BTW any updates on preserve?

/pay @1 $1

but i don't think the money ever left my wallet, and i can't find documentation on proper syntax. why didn't it work?

more importantly, there is always a direct one hop path between any two nodes. this is why it's a small world.

/pay @Libs $10

that's the reason for the suggestion! your interface is your explanation.

that's cool - but how does the earn cash part work? site doesn't say.

3. Display the data and amount of boost
4. Display a comparison chart that shows how the boost level of your content compares to all other boosted content.

i know the equivalent to 1-3 can be done the site, but the way it is presented is not self-explanatory IMO. what's clear to you is not evident to all. very few will read the whitepaper, fewer with understanding.

the more robust usecase will be when social media plataforms have boost instead of likes or karma (can't expect ppl to be checking boostpow). but for proof of concept purposes, i find the current interface misleading.

i'm not the man for that job but something like this seems simple and clearer:

0. Go to boostpow.com
1. Hit 'explore content' (better: Hit 'find content uploaded to the BSV blockchain highlighted by POW boost')
2. Be requested to input txid
   ...

is this the settled interface to boosted content? a rolling feed is not perspicuous at all in this case (it evokes chronological order). it's not clear what's being communicated unless you already get it and disregard the format.

and every day that passes the gap between the two mentalities grows wider. there is an ominous feeling it could bring the house down.

gardening sounds right. elected officers' incomprehensible detachment has got me kerfuffled. lame fud on slack.

谢谢! you also emailed me and i've been too disorganized to reply -- i will take you up in the slack channel.

@908
https://pastebin.com/zU6YZW
what did you end up concluding from all that?

my bad: https://pastebin.com/zU6YZWXK

russell works on solving engineering problems posed to him for a very good salary. respect.

and money transfer with immutable yet updatable records on-chain is superior to recordless money transfer off-chain.

your "competent LN devs" are working on a technologically ill-conceived project based on economically shortsighted assumptions.

now that sounds dogmatic