12KUjW…pMtT

But if you have to produce the solution yourself, you have to be top-down.

Your body does not do "spontaneous order".

Bottoms-up is not the end-all and be-all.

Given a long enough timeframe, some man will make sure to improve things.

It essentially talks about creating an environment of incentives, and outsourcing the solution.

This environment has to be produced.

It requires power to achieve such an environment, that enforces voluntary cooperation.

It's like cricketers wishing for stadium, when they are in a forest. Wishes are not reality.

The next is the dogmatic belief in bottoms-up "spontaneous order" generated by "some entrepreneurs" just because there is positive incentive to improve things, and man will come and improve them.

And top-down order is not acknowledged or recognized.

BSV hadn't grown up then. "Long enough timeframe" is keyword here. The biggest, most powerful organization's/companies would be functioning through BSV, capturing all productivity, and taking out every other less efficient system

There are some flaws in Austrian economics and libertarians. Not a flaw, but it is incomplete.

The first is about non-agression principle and argumentation ethics.

Wishes are not there by default. There is no ethics in nature.

Co-creating 👍

They have a cost too. There are secondary rights, licenses and contracts which are made by consuming primary rights/insurances too.

There is an entire market which would get formed, lurching us forward as a civilization.

They have a cost too. There are secondary rights, licenses and contracts which are made by consuming primary rights/insurances too.

If we were more developed as a civilization, we would have had properly structured and developed industry for it.

Rights don't exist by default.
They have to be produced.

It is not achieved by decreeing it, just like food is not produced by gov decree simply saying that everyone should get food. In the end, it has to produced.

Rights are property. They have a price

I believe that geometries are foundational to understanding too. But do you understand why those particular geometries are used (I dont) Why for those elements particularly. I know that they are the only 5 platonic solids with each side being the same.

Dielectric fields. It is non-physical

Great. I was just about to refer to it:
Basically having a position on the table, for the monopoly of violence to get deployed for your interests, in your local region, or over assets.

a voter you have essentially no power (diluted to nothing, no contract, only promise, and indirect influence, it is ridiculous deal) (otherwise rallies and protests won't exist), but as a lobbying group and funder for campaigns you do.

It is totally ethical and rational to be exercising whatever influence/share you have, to the maximum degree you can for your interests.

You are not going to have a gunshot war with the police (the lockdowns proved that you can be forced arbitrarily, you have no power)

This is what happens when direct ownership and control of your rights are given away to politicians (like fund managers)

We have a share, a say, in the direction in which the monopoly on violence, gets deployed.

Until we have another alternative system in which are assets and rights are invested in, right now, they are all held under this monopoly

The fact is that we are socially bound in a network of rights and responsibilities.

Power is a zero sum game. It is accumulated, and it is in its nature to centralize.

If you don't want that position, and want to let your rights get traded on your behalf, without any say in where it goes, in what organisation or structure it is invested to empower you are welcome.

Your rights are getting negotiated on a table, in which you want to have no direct representation, or direct control.

Your rights are getting traded essentially, by those who have the position at the table which has pooled everyone's rights.

You would get to see that your tax dollars were spent to pay for this gov employee, or this project, or department. It could be the norm to know what your taxe outputs are getting spent on, what you are funding or getting billed for.

So all the outputs would be getting pooled from taxes and then getting spent as payment for employees and organisations, and shit, whose transactions they would be linking in their account book, and pressurized as basic accounting practice to release

Oh
Hmm
Yes, it is full charge of development. It's like creation of a rule book for a game, and a stadium.

But once the game is set, people only use it as a reference implementation, as an example, and make their own softwares to optimize within the rules

Shareable is not the same as authority for records, such that there can't be multiple, and only the one blockchain is used for reference on the truth.

They won't be able to, if it is structured in a way that the outputs which go as taxes will be tracked

You sound like socialists saying money is bad. Power is a tool, just like money.

More power beats less power. Your competitor will take advantage, like it or not.

It's in the nature of any organis(m/ation) to increase their power (except libertarians)

Pressure to move people in the direction you want them to.

Right now, it is control/influence over the monopoly of violence apparatus (gov), to pressure for your interests, instead of your getting pressured by someone else's interests and plans (Bill).

And that's why libertarians are forever powerless, because that word "Power" is a blasphemy.

They don't realise that power is just another good, and it is a GOOD, not a bad. We want more power with more people.

Monopoly in a free-market?
https://youtu.be/Dvb2j0Wt218

Free-market disables formation of monopolies. It is continuous competition. This same fallacy has been made by small-blockers regulating in order to "decentralise"

Free market in block production will create monopoly? 😑 this is the same argument against free-market that has been explained so many times before. The point, is to have a free open participation market. It is "regulation", that paves way for monopoly

And you underestimate the power of bitcoin. Every other system can be infiltrated and overthrown, given a long-enough time-frame, because their incentive systems are not aligned, have the cartel problem, and competing against a fault tolerant system.