It is better to return what belongs to the donkey! And to apologize to the donkey for it. Theft must be punished! 🤪🫏🚨
960 535 sat
Post by Joe
looks like @52293 tried to send you one
316 330 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 960 360
- Time
- 2026-08-01T05:27:57Z
- Signer
- 18u3A3ruuHXviDcKj59AaB9cNy7tGdoySF
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
18u3A3ruuHXviDcKj59AaB9cNy7tGdoySF UnverifiedReplies (3)
Thanks, that’s kind of you. I don’t want the buyers—who knew nothing about this—to send the NFTs back to me. I’ve already sent them back to the buyers. The scammer needs to return my NFTs and apologize. Or Twetch needs to set this matter right for me. Anything else, however well-intentioned, is—in my view—neither legally nor morally right! ✍️
i bought them with the intent of returning them to you. thank you for sending them back to me again. however, to clear up some confusion, do you still expect those 5 twonks i sent you to be returned by the scammer or can we regard them as untainted? i can send them to you a second time. no problem.
952 254 sat
thread continues here
1L1hdw…mzDf 2mo
@6626 @4 @0 Even though some people might find this ridiculous, I want to give the scammer a chance to return the stolen NFTs to me. As a sign of loyalty and a change of heart, he or she may choose the most valuable item from my Nakamotors collection. BitcoinSV should be the blockchain that everyone looks up to—not the one others look down on. That is why I am offering up my hardworking, crazy Donkey. I want a clean BitcoinSV. I demand a lot from others, but I am also always ready to give a lot back. Cheers! 🤪🫏✍️🍻