Post by twetch#4245

16SgJC…e6WS Key · twetch

It's probably not helpful in the long run for crypto to be seen as an exclusively right wing thing. Wouldn't people who want wider adoption for these technologies want to double the audience of people potentially interested?

13idDC…KmSV Key · twetch

Different ideologies, different crypto.

I guess a central bank controlled crypto like the one visa is developing should be fine for those who follow the communist manifesto.
Or Ripple. Or BTC, for that matter.

What the chain says
Block
635 365
Time
2020-05-17T23:41:42Z
Signer
13idDCKB2oZMuUPVnPJ74aWJModTUMKmSV
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain
Name in tx
twetch#4245

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 13idDCKB2oZMuUPVnPJ74aWJModTUMKmSV Verified

Replies (12)

16SgJC…e6WS Key · twetch
Replying to@13idDC…KmSV

Yeah, I mean left wing and right wing ecosystems sort of develop, and maybe one day they'll really be left and right social media platforms even more than now. But just to be clear, I think the assosciation of authoritarianism with leftism here is bizzare.

16SgJC…e6WS Key · twetch
Replying to@16SgJC…e6WS

Personally, I'm perfectly moderate between anarchocommunism (eg wikipedia) and anarchocapatalism (bitcoin) and fuck all the worlds Dear Leaders. Plus we all have the same enemies.

13idDC…KmSV Key · twetch
Replying to@16SgJC…e6WS

Anarcho-communism...

Frankly, i don't think Marx was serious about communism. It was just the lure to get freedom-minded people into radical statism (socialism).

If marxism was a religion, its commandment would be to sin till sin withers away.

13idDC…KmSV Key · twetch
Replying to@16SgJC…e6WS

Bizarre? I wish I could agree.

I just can't see a way of abolishing private property without a state-like entity CONTROLLING it.

With one exception: the voluntary giving up of private property in a post-scarcity world.

16SgJC…e6WS Key · twetch
Replying to@13idDC…KmSV

Yeah, well private property doesn't really exist. It's just a network of contracts about who agrees who has the right to use what, and like anything else, the state messes it up by making the contracts non voluntary. Some examples make this very obvious:

16SgJC…e6WS Key · twetch
Replying to@16SgJC…e6WS

How much IP should there be? Which natural resources need to be privatized? How do you really decide without authority?

Continue thread →

This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.