Post by RSI PsYCho🐸

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch

Thanks bro my experience with shrinks since 2017 has been when I was in severely altered states ("psychoses") so they were no help at all. Because the truth of what was happening, first of all they wouldn't believe anyways ("Intelligence agencies engaged me" is just auto-reject to them)... Secondly it was mixed up with erratic behaviour and some nonsense, so there was 0% chance for reception.

Now I'm not in one of those states so we'll see. I can very eloquently describe what happened and respond to any objections she has immediately. It's going to be interesting I guess.

This is a problem with shrinks for me particularly: "Intelligence agencies engaged me" is literally true in my case. Probably it's true in like 0.0001% of cases globally or whatever tiny number. Well, shrinks are absolutely hardwired to ignore the extreme outlier possibility and round 99.9999% up to 100%. That's my problem here.

43 126 sat
1K7fN1…hPDE Unverified · twetch

Sorry that happened to you.
Yea just tell them how it is

43 124 sat
What the chain says
Block
970 217
Time
2026-10-08T20:23:04Z
Signer
1K7fN131LXFPDSZkdyzHuChKPcUXjMhPDE
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1K7fN131LXFPDSZkdyzHuChKPcUXjMhPDE Unverified

Replies (1)

18xXxq…a31p Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1K7fN1…hPDE

It is what it is, I have tried to share a lot of it here because I think people here can understand it.

I have done a lot of experimenting with my strange position.

Hopefully some day people understand what happened to me was true. That's what I want most.