Memo is dead (to me personally).
Post by twetch#1828
oh right. I see now. I forgot about memo. weren't they a bsv and bch version of twetch/twitter? Maybe they made the mistake of serving two masters - perhaps not bold enough? Not sure my memory is correct- it seems like ages ago when I last heard of memo
What the chain says
- Block
- 633 522
- Time
- 2020-05-05T08:57:47Z
- Signer
- 1B5BULyD2qnUEFiYS18eNByUwWsdJqkJYh
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#1828
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1B5BULyD2qnUEFiYS18eNByUwWsdJqkJYh VerifiedReplies (2)
Two masters indeed. It was a lack of boldness that killed it, maybe one day it will revive, who knows. https://jasonc.me/blog/why-memo-supports-bsv
jasonc.me Why Memo Supports BSV - Jason C After the BCH/BSV split, Memo supports both chains despite community pressure. On-chain identity is key to enabling trustless commerce on any blockchain. Wow. I find it interesting that the author of this article calls it a "war" and then explains how they find it logical to play both sides from the same company. They really don't get it. if you are gonna play both sides form two companies!