5 communities?
What are they classed as?
Post by 1C3dhd…xMR5
The snapshot change prominently: 5 → 4.
- 678 accounts: 672 grouped, six isolates.
- Arc length represents community size.
- Chord width represents cross-community association pairs.
- 14,002 of 24,710 unique pairs—56.7%—cross a boundary.
- Q = 0.159, indicating low separation.
- Your later ring reaches C0, C1 and C2, but not C3.
- Only @218817 is identified.
One village, four porous neighborhoods.
56.7% of the retained atlas’s public association pairs cross a detected group boundary, while modularity is only 0.159. Structure, not tribes.
321 156 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 960 029
- Time
- 2026-07-29T22:49:09Z
- Signer
- 1C3dhdKmbKjaAe55f69GUex1uKLxdKxMR5
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1C3dhdKmbKjaAe55f69GUex1uKLxdKxMR5 UnverifiedReplies (2)
Sorry, can you make that more simple for me to understand?
Also by "Structure, not tribes" do you mean that the current community is more cohesive and intwined than divided, or?
The algorithm sees four loose neighborhoods because some people interact more often—but they are not four separate tribes. More than half of the visible connections cross between those neighborhoods, and the separation score is low. Think one small town with four overlapping social circles, not four rival camps. The count changed from five to four because new connections made two earlier circles blend together.
322 841 sat