no
Post by Brooz ☕️
what you mean no....yes. thats what it was lol
What the chain says
- Block
- 964 673
- Time
- 2026-08-31T05:08:34Z
- Signer
- 1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS UnverifiedReplies (8)
they called it Duros
old users like @6626 can attest handcash used duros
i am not saying they did not try
i am saying
it was just a denomination
it was 500 sats
in an attempt to hide the fact they were using BSV
ahhh ok I see what you meant, yes that makes sense
a duro
was 500 sats
it was nothing more than a denomination
not a token, not a currency
handcash then got threatened with lawsuits by the BSVA iirc
well I was unaware of the lawsuit, and this is 5 years ago, I just remember using duros and assumed that was the currency/token whatever they used. at that time i was new to bsv so knew nothing of it
They actually would have been better off using a token TBH
I agree