could the other UN nations even present factual argument that their own Agenda 21 plans would have been more effective and astute.
astute means showing an ability to accurately assess situations or people and turn this to one's advantage...
Post by twetch#15875
...Or would they even bother to acknowledge any such event as being a UN nations local governmental Agenda 21 'step that must be taken'.
Since 2015, Sustainable Development Goals are included in the UN Agenda 2030
en.wikipedia.org Agenda 21 - Wikipedia What the chain says
- Block
- 625 903
- Time
- 2020-03-12T10:53:38Z
- Signer
- 148sxacPXapQNhFBRnY9PPY5qcyoiacGeq
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#15875
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
148sxacPXapQNhFBRnY9PPY5qcyoiacGeq VerifiedReplies (7)
the UN Agenda 2030 speaks of 17 sustainable goals.
and are intended to be achieved by the year 2030, and are part of UN Resolution 70/1 on sustainable development
these 17 goals include..
No Poverty
Zero Hunger
Good Health and Well-being
Quality Education
Gender Equality
Clean Water and Sanitation
Affordable and Clean Energy
Decent Work and Economic Growth
Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure...
Reducing Inequality
Sustainable Cities and Communities
Responsible Consumption and Production
Climate Action
Life Below Water
Life On Land
Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions
Partnerships for the Goals
basically a entire load of shit...
for as you can clearly see.
Not one of those 17 goals even if achieved will fix recent explosive population growth
(what is resource and eco-system consumption) numbers by 2030
Worldometer World Population by Year - Worldometer Population growth through history from 5000 BC to the current year (2026) for the entire population of the world