I could go on all day, but BTC is a fascinating experiment that helps clarify the true price of bitcoin, what if the point was to prevent the metanet? Helps me to think about the difference between miners, nodes and users while applying Metcalfe's law.
Post by twetch#8952
Yes it makes sense- the metanet could not work on btc at all. Its like having a slow internet connection. This is exactly what Craig Wright has been saying all along but noone is listening in the mainstream.
What the chain says
- Block
- 634 914
- Time
- 2020-05-14T20:35:36Z
- Signer
- 19C3V2TFr43KZb6c9wJT9V3Ayz9gZpJVek
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#8952
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
19C3V2TFr43KZb6c9wJT9V3Ayz9gZpJVek VerifiedReplies (1)
It was deliberately decided to always leave BTC as just for BTC, and let other things fork off. Hence why NMC was a fork. Then all tokens started going on ETH. But yeah, blockchains should be tokens for something in the chain-BSV is a token for the metanet