In this case you responded to the fruits of my labor and capital by replying to me. So you did not have a problem assigning it to "my self".
Do you have an example where you have a difficulty assigning (capital) causes and effects?
Post by twetch#15231
"Anything a person can do is backed by capital." The ability to remain in a pure witness, non-dual state does not depend on capital which I defining as matrialism. To assume the Self IS capital is to define Self in materialist terms which do not apply.
What the chain says
- Block
- 633 773
- Time
- 2020-05-06T18:38:48Z
- Signer
- 1EcXZGMVxsmcY4X13PsH5hNJqafytn3EMH
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#15231
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1EcXZGMVxsmcY4X13PsH5hNJqafytn3EMH VerifiedReplies (4)
You cannot be a "pure witness" in a "non-dual state". At best you can get to 99.9999999% to one side, but never elimate the other.
See Bohr and Heisenberg. Also see "Principle of Complementarity".
It's not a matter of IF you can since to "be" it implies existing in a temporal realm and not the non-dual, causal pure-witness. It's not something to become. It's a part of your nature; something to awaken to. This is the path of contemplative wisdom.
Just for the record, I understand the entire universe as "Self" reflecting back on itself in an infinite regression like a mirror reflecting itself.
But I'm also undoing years of harm from Descartes Dualism. The EPR paradox is relevant here.
To be capital pure Self would have to be objectifiable. Pure Self is the witness in which all objects arise and is incapable of being made an object. The pure Self is not capital since no body houses pure subjectivity. That's why "it can't be eliminated."