I see i misunderstood your point...
I read 'regular' instead of 'regulated.'
My point stands.
You miss the ability to care in those who won't give up individual rights.
I miss the ability to care in those who dispute individual rights of others.
Post by twetch#13963
Hmm..So you cant care for people in risk group because they are limiting your rights (as part of solutions for them)? You realise this means part of human population? I dont belive in such selfishnes, its a confusion between reason and solution quality.
What the chain says
- Block
- 630 836
- Time
- 2020-04-16T09:58:20Z
- Signer
- 17mTh3k4Z7QD7n4KgGEgG9H4sec3v1Dbcc
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#13963
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
17mTh3k4Z7QD7n4KgGEgG9H4sec3v1Dbcc VerifiedReplies (1)
The only selfishness I see is trying to force others to do your will.
Limiting other people's rights for perceived safety is the most selfish thing I can think of...
Am I willing to voluntarily take steps to help others survive?
Sure.