And hence I read both. I have no problems with the scriptural claims around textus receptus, but the refusal to update it to modern english (NKJV is not it), seems to me that the old english itself has become an idol.
Post by twetch#8952
Check Mathew 6:13- not the same in modern versions. You decide if every word maters.
What the chain says
- Block
- 628 576
- Time
- 2020-03-31T06:06:32Z
- Signer
- 19C3V2TFr43KZb6c9wJT9V3Ayz9gZpJVek
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#8952
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
19C3V2TFr43KZb6c9wJT9V3Ayz9gZpJVek VerifiedReplies (3)
It's possible the ending to the prayer came from an oral traditon practiced by early Christians, then added to the text by a scribe.
I already read the KJV, don't need to convince me. And as Forest Gump said, that's all I have to say about that.
Did God preserve his word and do we have the word of God in the modern Universal language of learning? If yes then which version, because they are not the same and all modern versions remove verses.
NIV. It includes contested verses like John 1-11, Acts 8:37, 1 John 5:7, in either italics or footnotes, so the reader has access to them and can research them.
God sent three teachers in my journey to Christ. They all taught me with NIV. I trust God.