Post by 1nFRUq…HooB

Y 1mo
1Gwece…AV6R Unverified · twetch

Yes. When things don't go your way you gotta throw a tantrum.

It's the right thing to do.

Unverified · twetch

Interesting.

So you think a handful of people should be able to block any user they want from seeing and engaging with content posted here.

You, the guy who is so anti-state (this ^ is extremely state-coded), anti-thought police (This is objectively thought policing), allegedly.

But if the user launches a hilarious counter-attack, it's a tantrum.

What the chain says
Block
961 905
Time
2026-08-11T22:17:24Z
Signer
1nFRUq5taEzS4aeEDtXskD5CcxQqcHooB
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1nFRUq5taEzS4aeEDtXskD5CcxQqcHooB Unverified

Replies (3)

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1nFRUq…HooB

Bore off dude, lay off the drugs.

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1LvFzU…opK3

I see, so when someone accurately exposes that thought policing is now active on Twetch, and anyone can do it to anyone else if they don't like their ideas, it's "drugs"

You and others think you should have the right to restrict anyone you want from seeing any content you interact with

Concerning

Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Q2PAE…gNyS

Remember, you can never actually block me.