Post by RIchard A. Hein

1FgiUa…dxR7 Unverified · twetch

Attempting to reverse engineer Twonks.

124 523 sat
What the chain says
Block
970 083
Time
2026-10-07T21:01:38Z
Signer
1FgiUa9oMqcEsHyPD6i3yLTu2qq9BzdxR7
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1FgiUa9oMqcEsHyPD6i3yLTu2qq9BzdxR7 Unverified

Replies (11)

1QCyCm…hoTj Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1FgiUa…dxR7

It’s really not that hard they are Sigil protocol. The main problem is the indexing. Twetch would have to index everything you mint.

Also, legacy Twonks, Eggs, and Tendies all use multisig, so transfers can only be completed through a Twetch account.

41 472 sat
1QCyCm…hoTj Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1FgiUa…dxR7

I have the minter build if you want it.

41 472 sat
1FgiUa…dxR7 Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1QCyCm…hoTj

Yeah but like you mentioned, Twetch would have to index them or it’s pointless unless I make a site for trading all twonks and index them

1QCyCm…hoTj Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1FgiUa…dxR7

The newer Twonks can be transferred into another wallet, but indexing becomes an issue when sending them back to Twetch. Sometimes you have to force a reset through the Twetch API to get them to show up properly. I built this wallet myself and had a hell of a time getting my Egg and Tendie back into my Twetch wallet because of the multisig requirements.

41 494 sat
1FgiUa…dxR7 Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1QCyCm…hoTj

interesting ... thanks

Continue thread →