You own your body and the fruits of its labor.
If you dont, you are a slave.
About IP: Difficult topic.
CSW and Kinsella had a discussion about it.
I tend to agree with Kinsella.
Twetchers probably disagree...
Post by twetch#21877
Yeah for sure there's some property everyone agree on - that's why I chose the example of food - even animals show evidence of belief in private property for food, and you are right that only the most totalitarian regime could take that basic precept way.
What the chain says
- Block
- 635 482
- Time
- 2020-05-18T16:47:18Z
- Signer
- 17ZU3LUhcDYvBDEmuyHJFYaquCYZUDi6fg
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#21877
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
17ZU3LUhcDYvBDEmuyHJFYaquCYZUDi6fg VerifiedReplies (10)
As for owning fruits of your labor? Yeah, sure, but how much is the result of labour rather than capital? Should you pay $0.10 a follow but receive only $0.08? Is that $0.02 the unpaid fruits of your labour? Should it be $0.09? Or $0.07?
The point of all these questions is simply that what contracts network of contracts of right to use arise should be decided through voluntary contracts, rather than a centralized idelological conception of which things are and are not property.
The irony is that when it’s voluntary even @2284 likes monetizing his words, and even the anarchocapitalists love the fixed price set at zero on Wikipedia.
I'd gladly pay for a wikipedia that is more transparent, balanced and less ideological.
Micropayments will hopefully get us there.
Completely agree about voluntary contracts.
In fact, if it's not voluntary it's not a contract.
Like the social 'contract'.
you probably won't believe me but honestly
i just followed you before seeing this message as i was still reading the last one and what is a conspiracy?? 👿💔
i almost deserve a return 🤤