Post by John Pitts

1ENXqW…xWMd Key · twetch

Craig CrAiG CRAIG!!!!
by John Pitts

I will be talking about Craig Wright's Satoshiness all the fuck I want.

In fact, if you don't like this, unfollow ALL my accounts. Not only will I talk about Craig Wright as Satoshi Nakamoto all the fuck I want, but I resolve to DOUBLE my efforts. So if you thought I talked about Craig and his Satoshiness too much in the past, it's about to get worse.

Here's some more reasons to unfollow me before I block you anyway, numbered below.
FYI before I start:
I've been officially outed as blocking:
my friends who think it's 100% chance Craig is a forger and felonious criminal
writers of early (shitty) bitcoin software on which my first and only bitcoin application was/is based.
CTO's of companies which hold the most bitcoin patents in the world.
These were among my BEST blockwork, and there will be more coming.

But here's some criteria:

  1. If you haven't figured out CSW is Satoshi by now, you're doing it wrong. It's not about documents of his past, or even most of his witnesses (who saw or didn't see white papers). It's certainly not about metadata, which is the most imperfect shitty "science" there ever was. Any judge worth his salt knows electronic documents are forgeable, framable (as in, "he got framed"), alterable, manipulated, altered, disintegrated, bit-rotted, pieces of Spok shit. The way to figure it out, is to get smart on bitcoin, including many tough subjects you might've tried to sleep thru in high school, like probability math, high-level problem solving, computer science, logic, economics, business and sociology. If you think the earth is flat, it's probably because you didn't take your schooling serious enough, and have fucked-around for most of your life, not caring a lick about actual science until you watched some Joe-Sixpack spout some weak non-sensical beer-logic in YouTube. You skipped taking Navigation in college, which any halfwit Mayan or Egyptian would've known 600 to 4,000 years ago without any degree, and instead took Art and Golf as classes, or just got out of studying things alltogether. If you don't know Craig is Satoshi, that's fine, but there's no need to follow me, as i'm not going to convince you, and I'm sure of that.

  2. You don't use and like any BSV apps. I've seen too many of these types, and began blocking them more than a year ago. Why? Because they are dumb, and I don't need to interact with dumb. If all you want is your BSV price to go up, you've been in the wrong digital asset for over 5--7 years. What's worse, is if you wanted Number to Go Up, the BEST way to make that happen is to use BSV apps (besides using them bc they're really f'g cool— take "troll toll" concept invented by Twetch, brilliant). If you haven't figured THAT out, then again, I'll never be able to help you, so unfollow me. I was there when the internet was young, and I didn't get into internet apps like email, yahoo, Expedia, Google, Amazon, Netflix, Napster music subscriptions (10 years before Spotify happened) and eBay because it was going to make me money quickly. I got into it because it was cool, and the future. The fact that I made a LOT of money getting familiar with those apps, was a fortunate after-effect of my love of the advancements of humankind. Had I made NOTHING on the emergence of the dotcom/internet, I'd STILL have gotten involved in the apps. If you don't have that same curiousity, then why are you here? Go speculate in the things whose numbers go up FAR more easily than Bitcoin which apparently must rely on fundamentals to get a higher price. So be it. My BSV wallet looks like a vacuum cleaner for dust transactions, and if yours doesn't, you're fucking doing bitcoin wrong. Go somewhere else, speculate until you lose all your money and then some, and come back in several years when you realize you MUST come back or else you'll be using chad products which are long outdated (like the yellow pages were to Google).

Satoshi, aka Craig, pointed out how the potentially 256 leading zeroes are created using bit-shifting, not "floating point". You see, even just in the middle of this article, I'm going to absolutely terrorize readers with talk of Craig Craig Craig. So if you're still reading, then I guess you're no Jan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2fXs3bf-p0

Satoshi matters. This is unfortuante, but true. Why does he matter? Because I continue to hear ridiculous coderBro things like:
"let's change btc to allow Ordinals"
Let's fork BSV like btc did to bitcoin, we don't need Craig Wright.
CTOR wasn't such a bad idea.
bitcoin should have no patents.
bitcoin should have no leadership.
bitcoin should have no rules! (bitcoin is a fucking PROTOCOL for a commdity, Bitcoin IS fucking rules, that's ALL bitcoin is!

Craig Wright needs to babysit his fucking creation, or formally and publicly declare that he is incapable and hand over the protocol to someone who will stand up and manage it for him— taking the risk that this person might be a total fucktard Christie or Shagger-doosh CoderBro dork who doesn't know a commodity from a second hole in his brain. If a mafiaso boss can continue to manage his crime family from jail, then Craig should figure out how to do the same, or loudly and publicly give up. So far he has not. He said a long time ago, in 2019 (Toronto I believe) that he wished he didn't need to come back. But he ASSUMED everyone understood bitcoin or something; CLEARLY that is not the case. As someone brilliantly pointed out during court last month, I might know how to drive a racecar, but that doesn't qualify me to talk about MAKING racecars. I know a LOT about bitcoin, more than most, but there's a plethora of reasons Craig Wright is the one and ONLY person to oversee bitcoin for as long as he can. And when he's finished, before he's finished, he must choose a successor, which can be in the form of committee (like the Bitcoin Association or whatever they call themselves these days), or a single person such as Gavin. But SOMEONE will ALWAYS need to sit around and do very little until some fucktard tries to change the protocol for stupid reasons, like there will always be some fucktarded eggheads who try to change the Swift language and libraries (which breaks my apps about every year or so, causing me great pain) or try to implement CTOR because they never once considered that bitcoin might get upto 10 billion transactions a second some day. Som yong guy (not to be confused of the creamed soup) will always think he knows better, but it's almost gauranteed he does not. Furthermore, it doesn't matter if Som Yong Guy knows better, he can go design a competitor to bitcoin [BSV] any time he likes; HELL, bitcoin is open fucking source for crissakes. It BEGS you to clone (not fork) it, and "roll your own". Do it! I might even do it, if I see that bitcoin has no hard backing (information, computation). I still am not 100% sure Craig knows his ass from a hole in the wall with respect to the definition of money, but that's OK. He has still taught me more things than almost anyone else on this planet, at an age (53) where I dont' learn much of any large value very frequently anymore.

Craig is Satoshi Nakamoto just as I am the creator and foundtain head of SLictionary. When I consider what it would take for me to prove I'm the creator of SLictionary, man o man, there would be a LOT of lost documents, and SERIOUS possession problems with the data required. There's probably TWO DOZEN different "I don't own my own data" apps in which I used to help me create it.

My personal account is not here to be friendly, it's here to learn and have other brilliant people teach me things. So far so good. I've gone from bitcoin neophyte to roughly working on my Masters Degree of Original Bitcoin. During the trial I was forced to dig even further into the C++ original version 0.1 code to figure out if Adam Back has a fucking clue what he's even talking about wrt the leading-zeroes difficulty factor. He is clueless, but very snippy about his ignorance (i² = -1 == indignant ignorance, the worst quality of man).

Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, and you'll be hearing a LOT about that from me in the near, medium, and long term future, as I retry this case and it's "evidence" VENEVER DA FOCK EYE VANT.
🎥
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkI4VDQrH4Q
🎥

What the chain says
Block
836 430
Time
2024-03-19T22:00:07Z
Signer
1ENXqWtbCLCMFFeyDREdEGW89nBecFxWMd
App
twetch
Type
post
Content type
text/plain

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1ENXqWtbCLCMFFeyDREdEGW89nBecFxWMd Verified

Reposted by (1)