I think so because you have to play all the games to have a chance to be at the top of the daily slam.
Post by Brooz ☕️
interesting point
I do like the variety though. I think maybe keep the leaderboard for like 7-10 games that maybe rotate weekly, and then you have the rest of the games to play with no impact on the leaderboard just for fun until the rotation
229 226 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 392
- Time
- 2026-08-22T06:11:37Z
- Signer
- 1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS UnverifiedReplies (3)
That would be a good solution.
Limiting it at 7 games would be very good time wise.
228 702 sat
cc: @76 @219004 I agree to this.
keep the leaderboard payouts for 7 games weekly, and rotate games in amd out weekly to keep it interesting. have the games that aren't in the leaderboard payout criteria as free to play just for people to enjoy playing
468 032 sat
Will update daily leaderboard to best 6 daily ranks
708 800 sat