When someone says "It's just semantics" is the moment I disengage from the conversation.
They just revealed their stupidity, are ignorant of what 'semantics' means, and they wish to dismiss your argument.
Post by twetch#15231
Was I guilty of this in our conversation?
What the chain says
- Block
- 633 777
- Time
- 2020-05-06T19:45:19Z
- Signer
- 1EcXZGMVxsmcY4X13PsH5hNJqafytn3EMH
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#15231
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1EcXZGMVxsmcY4X13PsH5hNJqafytn3EMH VerifiedReplies (2)
Haha. No.
Something completely unrelated reminded me to post that public service announcement.
Haha, ok, good. I was trying not to do that. Thanks for the engaging perspective you shared. I looked up a lot of the concepts you referenced, EPR, Bohr, Heisenberg, P.o.C. etc I'll spend some time digesting them. I like your take on capital a lot.