Tbh, my big beef is CSW. He's very abrasive. Aside from that, Calvin is a bafoon (imo) and I'm unclear on how "centralized" it is (ie, how many miners control what percent of hashing power?)
What I do like: stable protocol, made an attempt to scale + more
So aside from personalities of people involved, it's about clarity around centralization of miners.
BSV will outgrow both CSW and Calvin.
After BTC halving the musical miner chairs will realign. Interesting to see what happens after the dust settles.
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1P5p7jBVqRWWYQvP1Yfd82AW2WjZs2Dbwt VerifiedWell, it's about several similar things. I also worry about sharing hashing algorithms with BTC/BCH. I worry about security, speed, centralization. The usual things
On the plus side, There are some really talented dev teams in BSV that make great products
You should know that there are less than 30 actual nodes in BTC. The rest are just sybil machines that create a fake signal to make you think the network is strong, when in fact it is so weak that it's about to collapse.
But... Aussie Man Bad right?
Well, as I previously said....I'm aware of BTC's problems and worry about them equally (if not more, tbh).
I actually own more BSV than BTC
I own 0 BTC. When BTC failed to scale in 2017, I immediately learned several things and moved my finances elsewhere.
BTC is fundamentally broken. LN is a scam, and Blockstream....don't get me started.
At least BSV has a plan (even though aussie man bad)
Now, now, no need to go down that route. The guy is clearly giving BSV a chance. Be respectful for that reason if nothing else.
Fair point, just stating some home truths.