Peck by twetch#22429

1P64Th…1abU Key · twetch

Interesting conversation. I strongly disagree. Owning shares in a company !== owning shares in a person. That's called "Slavery". I assume your intentions are honorable, but there's likely a good reason to abstract investment to an entity which cannot die

twetch#22429 6.4y

Companies = persons, just formed as a legal entity, which I see as a useless middle man for me as an investors

Show me the future of investing, dont be afraid to have money thrown at you directly

YOU are the companie in the end

twetch#22429 6.4y

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch

Slavery historically did not involve negotiations, so it is a bold statement to compare my question to slavery as a concept

I also did not say owning shares of companies = owning shares of a person

I said companies are persons, formed as a legal entity

What the chain says

Transaction: aab8667ff10d5ea9f1cea86c33949b8801cd2ced46d69e4671d837977ec154e0
Block: 635 274
Time: 2020-05-17T06:56:04Z
Signer: 1P3nuztTbn1WV7WzfW16gAbMS3vEH3qhdV
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Reply to: 058f4ac6ce439d17c2e3f817565e07c138691ca1cb674f5de8482c2bc5dfc663
Name in tx: twetch#22429

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1P3nuztTbn1WV7WzfW16gAbMS3vEH3qhdV Verified

Replies (19)

twetch#22429 6.4y

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch

Replying to@1P3nuz…qhdV

If persons would be willing to directly let money be thrown at them in exchange for "a share of their income" they should be free to do so

Not being able to do so is closer to slavery than the idea of doing so itself

twetch#22429 6.4y

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch

Replying to@1P3nuz…qhdV

legal entities are a social construct after all

with benefits of course, and good reasons to have them

does not mean we have to stick to it though, there are cases where it would make much more sense for me to directly invest in persons if they agree

twetch#1512 6.4y

1P64Th…1abU Key · twetch

Replying to@1P3nuz…qhdV

Open to the possibility of improvement on the current situation. Quite sure that I personally would never accept such an offer of investment. What happens when the living person you own a revenue share in stops working? Or waived a salary? This sounds bad.

twetch#22429 6.4y

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch

Replying to@1P64Th…1abU

Right, I have no answers for that in detail - that is why I asked the question and said "Show me the future"

Let's wait for @255 he seems to have something planned. There has to be a way to do this via Bitcoin, the rest is negotiation and risk management

Continue thread →

twetch#22429 6.4y

1P3nuz…qhdV Key · twetch

Replying to@1P64Th…1abU

Question, Deggen, just brainstorming/example:

Someone gives you 50k in exchange for a 1% of your personal (!) yearly income for 5 years (just an example!)

You have no risk, he has it, but you have more money to scale/accelerate your work/ideas

Why not?

Continue thread →

Post by twetch#22429

Replies (19)