If BSV is Bitcoin, and if Bitcoin was hijacked way back in the day, then number goes up will not meaningfully occur in BSV without real usage demanding those sats. BSV'er who claim number goes up whilst also claiming Bitcoin was hikacked (I am not saying that is you) are claiming those who did the hijacking will now just ignore BSV as it ascends. This doesn't make any sense at all imho.
Post by palmbird
Thank you for the reply. For years i did not look at price or rank. Since 2 years or so i started following it , it gives me partly an indication. For much people price and rank are important. Of this 2 ,rank is what i look most. Of course i know adoption is factor 1 , it wil come. Some AI agents/ models can only be succesful on BSV. We don't have to worry. BSV is the best in class.
What the chain says
- Block
- 963 131
- Time
- 2026-08-20T10:10:23Z
- Signer
- 127eJxuaBw6kFHTFHUd5fmQi4Y3YzgNoTn
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
127eJxuaBw6kFHTFHUd5fmQi4Y3YzgNoTn UnverifiedReplies (2)
If we ever see BSV rise up in rank and transactions are increasing (both consistently over months) then it's game on (finally). Best in class does not guarantee anything in life.
I am old. For me best in class is most likely to do wel. Not always of course. BSV has Bitcoin in it's name what is also a good factor. There are many good things to say for BSV.