Ztrash has optional privacy, doesn’t matter if the tech is actually good. Fungibility is important and if privacy is not mandatory, the whole monetary system cannot be fungible.
Post by Y
Reminds me of the BTC narratives against BCH back in the day.
Personally, I'm done with choosing sides between coins and then fighting the other.
What the chain says
- Block
- 964 606
- Time
- 2026-08-30T18:31:55Z
- Signer
- 1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R UnverifiedReplies (1)
Nowhere near that, Monero is private by default, Ztrash is optional privacy.
Going from transparent to shielded has the same fungibility flaws as cashfusion, mimble wimble and other privacy tools built on top of a transparent coin.
Undeniable facts, not a made up narrative.
Monero competition can be found in Zano or Pirate Chain (I hold zero of them so I’m not biased), definitely not in an optional privacy coin.