Peck by twetch#1671

12axJP…rXm1 Key · twetch

I suspect the IFP proposal is a self-sabotaging ploy. Amaury and others succeeded in splitting the big block camp but now their quandary is having to actually compete and build BCH. They'd much rather refocus on derailing CSW. 1/

What the chain says

Transaction: a700307908556dc9067d99f3a36439a595f5d3026a2d2f1f0b7ee8b5ff7580ab
Block: 622 573
Time: 2020-02-18T06:48:16Z
Signer: 12axJPhmxvk3fbrk1CH9aTLvYkkYwerXm1
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#1671

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 12axJPhmxvk3fbrk1CH9aTLvYkkYwerXm1 Verified

Replies (2)

twetch#1671 6.6y

12axJP…rXm1 Key · twetch

Replying to@12axJP…rXm1

If the IFP succeeds the trolls will have resources to buy themselves some time. If IFP fails then the trolls will have cover to walk away from the cat-herding hell that is development on a lawless chain. 2/

twetch#1671 6.6y

12axJP…rXm1 Key · twetch

Replying to@12axJP…rXm1

The problem with hijacking a ticker from Satoshi is that you then have to maintain and compete. This is a huge timesink that takes away from their crypto-insurgency. They know it's a waste of time to find a way to make Avalanche work. 3/

Post by twetch#1671

Replies (2)