Agree.
The government shouldn't be involved
But that also means that the gov shouldn't be able to force men to pay for decisions they have no control over
If only the mother decides whether or not a child is born, she also has the sole responsibility.
The moment a male penetrates a woman he says "I am ready to be a father" same as the woman being penetrated says "I am ready to be a mother" both parties are responsible after that.
But again the government shouldn't be in charge of that.
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
1FaFgbsZCmkfg5ddaWZjUqyP7jW5MSDsnn VerifiedJust to be sure:
That means you are pro life, right?
For myself, I am pro life.
As a whole, I am pro choice because I have no right telling another woman what she should do with her uterus.
If two people come to a mutual agreement, they should have the right to abort.
Not my uterus, not my business.
You can not say "I'm a citizen" and "I vote", then say the government has no say in their property.
You are either sovereign and then exercise full autonomy or you are a subject, with limited rights and freedoms.
Choose one, you can not have both.
I was born being a subject, I really had no say in the matter. My options now are to overthrow the government or vote. I don't have the means to overthrow the government but I can still vote for my remaining rights and people to make a smaller government.
But do you agree that if there is a right to abortion, which means that the woman is the only one who has a say about whether or not the child is born, then she must also be responsible for the child or abortion and nobody else, unless they choose to?
No birth control is 100% effective but both parents have the right to waive parental rights such as adoption. If a woman chooses to be a single mom, she is not the governments responsibility. If a man doesnt want to waive parental rights, he should parent.