You're working within Euclidean geometry. Space is discrete, not continuous, so there are no "squares" that have a distance of 1 unit.
Create a square on your computer screen. You'll see it's composed of a countable number of units (pixels).
Post by twetch#5460
So either points are distributed in orthogonal grid and diagonal has equal length to the side of square (same amount of collinear points) or points are distributed in different fashion and squares don't exist?
What the chain says
- Block
- 662 384
- Time
- 2020-11-22T10:08:20Z
- Signer
- 1Mi4SXTA5gnBjgwK1DUn3ML3biMhay4SM2
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#5460
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Mi4SXTA5gnBjgwK1DUn3ML3biMhay4SM2 VerifiedReplies (3)
It's self-evident.
Yes it is, if you think about it thoroughly enough.
Self-evident doesn't always mean "immediately obvious." It means "simply by examining the concepts, you can know it."
Multiple professors have told me that logical contradictions exist. They are self-evidently wrong but haven't thought enough about it yet