We'll have to agree to disagree on that.
Post by Actual Ayyy
You can disagree and be wrong all you want
If you can't know for certain whether the things I listed exist or not/influence things or not, then you can't rule them out. Especially when each makes a lot of sense in different scenarios.
Saying "I know for sure you're wrong" about any of that is just arrogance
What the chain says
- Block
- 964 751
- Time
- 2026-08-31T20:35:18Z
- Signer
- 18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
18xXxqZbcMGzJUdvTSMj7VbqmyesZCa31p UnverifiedReplies (8)
What would be the best evidence you could give more for an ancient super intelligence or God?
Depends on if the universe is truly vast and ancient
If yes, and if life can pop up elsewhere (very plausible) then the odds of a superintelligence already existing before us are extremely high (if superintelligence is possible) since we're trying to make it ourselves.
God, well, God if it exists is way more based than ancient religions and their bad interpretations
Also, I've seen evidence of God personally through experience, as have other people. Interestingly, Abraxas might exist. If not, this could have been "the real God" using Abraxas as cover. If not, it could have been a superintelligence, or intelligence agencies (human tech) .
So your best evidence is a load of ifs and personal experience I couldn't possibly verify. Can you see why I have doubts.
Sure, doubts are one thing, saying "I know for sure x isn't real" is another.
If you can accept that I'm just relating my experience, which is obviously much different than yours, and that I'm just saying "I've seen evidence that indicates x y z could be happening but I'm uncertain any which way" then.. that's reasonable to me