See here:
Post by utxo detective
imo you’d need to change protocol and sats on a tx would be 8 bytes instead of 4 bytes
286 122 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 957 846
- Time
- 2026-07-14T14:50:00Z
- Signer
- 12tDncQvFZaZzqanupmtXpDUm42Wd4Cn4W
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
12tDncQvFZaZzqanupmtXpDUm42Wd4Cn4W VerifiedReplies (8)
Also what do you think about 0 sat utxo removal?
it doesn’t keep me up at night
286 122 sat
Gemini says you should be having nightmares 😅
idk.. it's just not Bitcoin man. It's something else. Maybe it's better, maybe it's worse, hard for me to tell because I can't predict the future.
“It guarantees total node centralization-ensuring that only institutional data centers can afford the hardware to run a node. He is actively
waving goodbye to any hope of a peer-to-peer civilian network.”
“Nodes.” Gemini has been huffing 17 years of BTC propaganda bullshit. 0-sat might be a concern for the future but it isn’t a concern for the 800 ranked coin, on its last legs, today.
572 040 sat
I don't understand personally what that accomplishes, but are you saying it requires a hard fork to fix?
it would give you more room to have smaller units