Post by 369BSV

189ovy…68Ud Unverified · twetch

I mean looking the first answer, it's clearly AI generated, and Pangram agrees saying it's 100% generated. So the question is, are your actually interviewing the guy and he's providing 100% AI answers (could be, some of his x.com content is AI generated now), or are you just trying to pull the wool over our eyes by impersonating this famously litigious multi-millionaire?

Attached image
369BSV 2mo

So this interview series with csw has had terrible interaction on twetch. I could post a picture of a frog and get more likes lol Im wondering after these last 3 questions. Should i not bother posting the next interview on here? I posted it here to try and get people from x to twetch but it seems no one really cares and just wants memes and twonks? Or are people reading it but not interacting? I dont mind no interactions but i feel csw deserves more than shouting to a empty room.

15AdFP…ts6y Unverified · twetch

Get ai to come up with pages and pages of technical answers and tell me its ai. Everyone thinks ai is some god of knowledge. Its really not. I imagine he does the same thing i do which is write aload of stuff then put it into ai too check my grammar my spellling and make sure the structure of the sentences is correct.

The questions i sent to him are literally ai tweaked also becausr of spelling and grammar.

Also dont ever questions my integrity again please i dont need to fake interviews with csw for popularity. Fuck me its been the least popular thing on here. Also he literally has the same part as question 5 in his substack. Also how ironic that you use ai to slander ai.... lmao

What the chain says
Block
961 085
Time
2026-08-06T08:02:21Z
Signer
15AdFPQbdHDWrTFqcudN94CgF5mmh3ts6y
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 15AdFPQbdHDWrTFqcudN94CgF5mmh3ts6y Unverified