Post by 1L1hdw…mzDf

1Q9hAP…8iJc Unverified · twetch

Contact those who have them now and try to buy from them.

Unverified · twetch

@243 Hello Sir—appeals didn't achieve anything. This is the result of your suggestion. This account holds the most valuable items from my Naka collection. What’s your take on it? Good, or really bad? Thanks in advance!

Attached image
What the chain says
Block
961 076
Time
2026-08-06T07:02:34Z
Signer
1L1hdw3fVUiubjzVVrDjm1vR6DW98VmzDf
App
twetch
Type
reply
Content type
text/markdown

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1L1hdw3fVUiubjzVVrDjm1vR6DW98VmzDf Unverified

Replies (3)

1Q9hAP…8iJc Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1L1hdw…mzDf

My take is this:
You voluntarily gifted your account to a scammer, unfortunately. Maybe this will happen again until you are able to survive self-custody.
You took a hit for being fooled, that means you acted like a fool and nature saw it.
Nobody owes you anything except for the scammer, who doesn't care about his moral debts because he doesn't understand he will pay for them anyway, in a much worse way. Moral debts are better paid voluntarily.

619 434 sat
1Q9hAP…8iJc Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1Q9hAP…8iJc

Some people that bought items from the scammer were aware of the scam, some probably weren't. Those people paid coins and those coins won't come back, they are the damage.
If those people return items to you then they are being generous and taking part of the damage on themselves out of compassion.

619 434 sat
Unverified · twetch
Replying to@1L1hdw…mzDf

Thank you, sir. What you say is not incorrect; it makes perfect sense. In my view, the entire situation is highly unsatisfactory. Naturally, the harm falls upon the person who made the mistake—but the blame? That is not necessarily the case. Nevertheless, I thank you for your honest opinion.

308 166 sat