なるほど,確かに「いいね」にかかるコストはエンゲージメントを下げる要因かもしれないし,フォローが無料になればユーザーの繋がりは増える可能性がある。
Post by Mr. B
If people are here just for the money, then the whole concept has failed and the platform has attracted the wrong crowd. “Scale” not profit. As a platform they are the ones who should make most at scale. But as users, we just need to enjoy the tech and to use it as a replacement to traditional methods, without feeling poor all the time by constantly spending too much on basic features. Want to spend and attempt to earn, buy Twonks, otherwise the social aspect should be a social aspect and should not prevent someone or make them hesitate on how many likes per time frame the can afford. Dopamine is also important for social platforms, you get paid less, but at least it happens more consistently and you feel like your content was actually acknowledged or viewed by others, rather than viewed but without engagement and you feel like “why am I even here”. Usage make the whole project and Bitcoin succeed. Otherwise bye bye Bitcoin. Long story..
To summarize, (for all the right reasons)
What the chain says
- Block
- 970 221
- Time
- 2026-10-08T20:53:05Z
- Signer
- 13fdCbw4tqZV6ziV93yqKr9gYRAsVxux1P
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
13fdCbw4tqZV6ziV93yqKr9gYRAsVxux1P UnverifiedReplies (2)
Also reduces the number of fisherman by a margin
Also reduces the number of fisherman by a margin while boosting real and organic engagement