But would it really be such a big problem if it was implemented fairly and applied to everyone? If the goal is to keep the leaderboard fair, I don’t think it would be unreasonable.
267 111 sat
Post by Brooz ☕️
I agree but its down to how @76 wants to run the arcade ultimately
266 489 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 961 606
- Time
- 2026-08-09T20:34:18Z
- Signer
- 1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CdETknnWodMWKfUqXYAyhgqWpsbgpvqVS UnverifiedReplies (7)
Yeah, absolutely. At the end of the day, it’s his platform and his decision. I just think it’s worth considering if it would help keep the arcade fair for everyone.
266 489 sat
I mean iv come #1 2 days in a row and regularly place top 5 so im not ultimately fussed atm. but just something im very aware of and not fair for others if one person takes up 5 spots just for the sake of am extra $1 lol
533 067 sat
I agree with you 100%, but if this platform is going to grow, there will definitely be more idiots creating 10 or more accounts each. At that point, the fun will be over. This needs to be dealt with before it becomes a much bigger problem.
266 489 sat
Im waiting to get access to twetch API. that will allow me to do more things. Like instant lb payouts ie haste etc. pay to play, tourneys and on chain assets much easier
534 580 sat
I’m a man of the players. It’s your arcade not mine. I will look into ways to address this
267 022 sat
As Brooz said, it’s not a problem at the moment, but we need to do everything we can to prevent greedy idiots from ruining yet another platform and destroying the great fun we’re having here.
535 116 sat
this ☕️
267 379 sat