Shizo-toll would be good enough. Blocking is better imho. In the extremely few cases where it is necessary.
Post by Ironshirtz
could have pay to view
then troll toll to reply
neither should have a cap
and a block should not even let you know they posted
they should never appear on your feed,
unless both tolls are paid.
275 482 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 961 658
- Time
- 2026-08-10T04:54:39Z
- Signer
- 1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1aUt6NCxtVcFg9aZRqKboQX7XVY4HjRpF UnverifiedReplies (4)
IDK they used to have "fund the feature" options as well. i'm sure the revenue generating options are in the queue....hopefully. .....
Otherwise Twetch is another retarded short lived BSV company.
I only mean pay to view for people you have blocked
not PPV in general, that would be silly
I agree with @6345
If you block someone,
they should not be able to view your posts
if you do not want them too
and unlike muted,
I should not even see that people i have blocked post something
(replies could be different as convo's may appear weird)
but maybe blocked posts could appear blurred to the blocked user
who could pay a fee to view it
then pay another fee to reply
both set by the by the blocker
teh revenue model is dif now, old twetch needed 1000 beatings for it to die, to get here. not 1000 tolls. old ideas failed, moving on..