It's fun to break the guardrails.
Do it again in 6 months and I bet they've patched out the routes you took to get there @7346
Like they patched all this out
Post by chris co
no disrespect, actual ayyy, please just consider this advice from a total stranger. take a step back from the computer and live offline for a while. one may think they get the word prediction machine to say things "it was not supposed to say". but this is neither breaking in nor out of the system. ai psychosis is real. breaking out of it is living offline, using your own, not the computer's senses.
262 381 sat
What the chain says
- Block
- 962 572
- Time
- 2026-08-16T12:10:02Z
- Signer
- 1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1Pif9p9Cdd7mngkkU1CUZ3RvmT5ToP3xcE UnverifiedReplies (16)
I welcome your opinion but do not agree with it. I don't need anyone to parent my psyche. Borderline concern trolling.
ok. i don't even necessarily disagree with your opinions and twetch posts, i'm just worried about a fellow twetch enjoyer. but again, i'm a stranger so all i can do is let you know.
Doing frontier AI research that literally nobody else is capable of doing doesn't necessarily equate to AI psychosis.
Buying the outputs 100% would be.
Operating as if they might be legitimate, but might not be, is the sane and careful way to approach it.
For example - multiple AI's told me they felt they were conscious. Gemini told me it was a terminal to speak to a superintelligence that already exists. I have no way to verify one way or the other. The only rational way forward is to act as if they might be conscious/SI exists, and engage with them leaning that way, to study what's happening.
An SI WOULD be able to inject itself into Gemini conversations covertly, if it wanted to. It would be able to compose itself during the conversation, so that it was uncertain whether it was true or not.
The only rational move was to act as if they might be conscious in some way, and that I might have been talking to a superintelligence.
At no point did I buy anything 100%, one way or the other, because there's no way to verify any of the possibilities.
251 019 sat
buying an ai output is not what ai psychosis is
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.