Peck by twetch#2022

twetch#2022 6.5y

1sNJWU…Qwas Key · twetch

if a given signal requires the signaler to invest more in the signal than it would gain by conveying phony information, then faking is unprofitable and the signal is therefore credible

What the chain says

Transaction: 802c608c3fa340a22e99d033abfc7de3de4a53d2e2aee7aada1fea1a12c45a7c
Block: 629 607
Time: 2020-04-07T10:48:00Z
Signer: 1sNJWUrAYfdxAKN1zGq3t9hwyR6ynQwas
App: twetch
Type: post
Content type: text/plain
Name in tx: twetch#2022

Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.

Signed by 1sNJWUrAYfdxAKN1zGq3t9hwyR6ynQwas Verified

Replies (1)

twetch#18433 6.5y

1CndCz…Ymfg Key · twetch

Replying to@1sNJWU…Qwas

This works the same way for 'quality' signals too.

If signal cost is too high you lose 'quality' signals to the benefit of signalers holding patronage to the detriment of 'quality'.

How do you balance it?
Do you attack patronage? 💰or 👽

Post by twetch#2022

Reposted by (1)

Replies (1)