reading the bible alone will confuse you. only reading it in tandem with the BoM will make the message clear. plus, the BoM story is a lot more interesting than the bible story, which is slow, confusing, and boring, with numerous plot holes.
Post by twetch#3981
Except the author J.Smith lost all credibility with his "translation" of Ptolemaic papyri to write the PearlofGreatPrice. Utter nonsensical interpretations of fascimilies, wrong Era. As we can now read hieroglyphs, this con should be impossible today.
What the chain says
- Block
- 627 538
- Time
- 2020-03-23T23:11:25Z
- Signer
- 13fZ7LNJTsSFfBLqswUdAUGQvea7Wf6yGJ
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#3981
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
13fZ7LNJTsSFfBLqswUdAUGQvea7Wf6yGJ VerifiedReplies (8)
the translations are fine to me. the fascimiles just came with the papyri, he didnt translate them. if you read them, most of it is uninterpreted.
Do you consider the BoM to be a factual history of the Americas?
yes. i have done more research than anyone to try and prove it wrong. and i couldn't. i also found many convincing evidences to prove that its factual, from many different sources. and when you read it, there is just something about it thats sorta magical.
BoM is replacement theology- it contradicts the bible- in several places. Most importantly it claim''s the priesthood of Aaron was restored.. Aaron was a hereditary priesthood- so that makes the mormons as holocaust deniers
What are your thoughts on The Late War Critique?