It's still early.
227 985 sat
Post by Y
Pre-iceberg,
but somehow
post-asteroid.
What the chain says
- Block
- 966 640
- Time
- 2026-09-13T21:35:39Z
- Signer
- 1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R
- App
- twetch
- Type
- reply
- Content type
- text/markdown
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1GwecezoL8jciHU2Ysyupxrnv18JMGAV6R UnverifiedReplies (21)
You don't need Iceberg. Unbounded scaling and scarcity process will do the works.
Just found out the "unbounded scaling" has never been officially confirmed by a third party, something any other chain/coin does without any issues. Which makes me wonder wtf that would be.
So far it's about as real as the "rolling icebergs" and the "asteroid" that was "the only thing that can stop coins from moving after the trial."
Makes me wonder how deeply you researched this. You saw a post from kirk and threw your hands in the air, neglecting some names in the post for you to look up. You'll keep the same narrative untill someone hand delivers you some new information
Kurt*
You mean like this? https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/web3/how-the-bsv-association-built-a-million-tps-blockchain-node-using-aws/
Amazon Web Services How the BSV Association built a million-TPS blockchain node using AWS | Amazon Web Services In this post, we show how BSVA used AWS services to build a distributed node architecture that achieves 1 million TPS across six Regions. This solution demonstrates how organizations can implement cloud infrastructure to solve complex blockchain scaling challenges while maintaining system integrity. This is not good enough for him. He wants third party audited report
Yes. But not a blog, actual third party tests and confirmation of real world capabilities, like, you know, all the other chains that want to prove their capabilities provide.
This thread is longer than one page shows. Open a reply to see what follows it.