The point is valid. There is no guarantee even if the intent exists
Post by twetch#6122
Ok I suppose you're right, but who is going to ask him? He's not the only miner, so singling him out seems a bit unfair....
What the chain says
- Block
- 625 252
- Time
- 2020-03-08T00:43:22Z
- Signer
- 1CnMfsXSPs2vfCUEkg8g2uXmGSoZsuPLK4
- App
- twetch
- Type
- post
- Content type
- text/plain
- Name in tx
- twetch#6122
Fields the transaction did not carry are omitted. Open the payload to see the bytes as stored.
Signed by
1CnMfsXSPs2vfCUEkg8g2uXmGSoZsuPLK4 VerifiedReplies (4)
If @4 is right that miners are governments, then censorship is likely sooner than later. Balance and (healthy) competition over the long term are key.
Something completely disastrous would have to occur for Calvin to cease mining BitCoin, and I don't see anything like that happening. Transformative hardly breaches an accurate description of the power of BitCoin.
Breach was a poor choice of words.. but oh well, I'm just speaking my mind.
I single him out because he directly or indirectly finds a MINIMUM 30% of BSV blocks. Probably more but thats "uknown" so plebs dont see too much centralization